Or 35mm?

Posted by Sean from ? (216.221.81.98) on Wednesday, October 08, 2003 at 1:42am :

In Reply to: Oops, that should be "...versions?" posted by Goodsport from adsl-216-102-199-185.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net (216.102.199.185) on Tuesday, October 07, 2003 at 10:20pm :

First time I saw Raiders on the big screen since I was a kid, was about 1992 - well after it'd been on pan&scam home video.

In the bar where Indy meets Belloq, I noticed that a gun was being passed, which was unseen in my copy on VHS. It changed the whole dramatic intensity of the scene, and added a new element of danger and tension.

If that ain't a case for widescreen I don't know what is.

Cheers,
Sean

Follow Ups:

Re: Or 35mm? - bamindy 7:24am 10/08/2003

Post a Followup

Name:

E-Mail: ( default )

Subject:

Message:
: First time I saw Raiders on the big screen since I was a kid, was about 1992 - well after it'd been on pan&scam home video. : In the bar where Indy meets Belloq, I noticed that a gun was being passed, which was unseen in my copy on VHS. It changed the whole dramatic intensity of the scene, and added a new element of danger and tension. : If that ain't a case for widescreen I don't know what is. : Cheers, : Sean

Optional Link ( default )

URL:

Title:

Optional Image Link ( default )

URL:

This board is powered by the Mr. Fong Device from Cyberarmy.com