Re: Why not have Selleck?

Posted by Groo from ppp-207-193-186-6.kscymo.swbell.net on February 22, 1999 at 20:51:51:

In Reply to: Re: Why not have Selleck? posted by Indiana James (Lambert) on February 22, 1999 at 14:30:38:

But this subject has been talked into the ground. It has gone into the oblivion. Many valid points were discussed long before you decided to post. I want to hear your opinions.
All I said was do some research and stay fresh Regards,
Groo

Follow Ups:

Post a Followup:

Name:    
E-Mail:  
Subject: 
Comments:

Link URL:   
Link Title: 
Image URL: