![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Posted by Sean from iah17-38-98.barrie.connex.net on August 12, 1999 at 15:36:43:
In Reply to: Re: Is Harrison too old to shoot Indy IV as late as 2005? No. Here's why... posted by The Man with the Hat on August 12, 1999 at 10:28:32:
: : : Something that occured to me and which I think is quite plausable.
: : : Perhaps Lucasfilm are gambling on the fact that they (or ILM, I suppose) will have developed the technology in the next few years to fully create a complete Indiana Jones using computers. They could make him any age they wanted!
: : : My initial reaction to such a thought was "no way!" but considering the pace at which this field is evolving, in a few years we won't be able to tell the difference between animation and the real thing.
: : : If this is the case, why not put Indy in the prime of his life rathar than risk a dodgy Indy IV with the aged Harrison Ford? (I know this notion will be opposed with the distinction between Harrison Ford and Indiana Jones to some as a very thin line...)
: : : Cheers,
: : : Rob
: : : ---
: : Hi Rob:
: : George Lucas is on record as saying that the first "human" CGI character won't be seen in his life-time...Whew!!!
: : Cheers,
: : Sean
: Hi---
: Actually, there were human CGI characters in "Titanic." They were shown from a distance on tracking shots of the ship i.e. people walking on the deck, etc.
: See ya,
: The Man with the Hat
:
: "Fortune and Glory, Kid. Fortune and Glory."
Hey:
Yeah, I guess you're right - but I was saying that the first CGI human ACTOR is along ways off, according to Lucas, who is certainly an authority. By this I mean a human character that is indistinguishable from a real person.
Cheers,
Sean