![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Posted by California Mike from 208-5-200-169.dialup.microweb.net on April 17, 2000 at 16:48:18:
In Reply to: Why not Selleck? posted by Hannibal King on April 17, 2000 at 11:56:57:
: Hey,
: There have been so many posts since I started visiting here about a year and a half ago stating that Selleck would have been terrible as Indy and I've never figured out why some of you feel that way.
: I think that if he'd have got the part he'd have been as goo in his own way as Harrison Ford.
: My Pro's for Selleck -
: He can carry off action sequences.
: He can be dramatic and light on equal terms.
: He could look like an adventurer.
: He's a good actor who's been served by some shit scripts and terrible films.
: However in two of his early films "High Road to China" and "Lassiter" he played two sides of the Indy persona well.
: I think that he'd have been fine. This isn't against Harrison who played Indy superbly, but for Selleck who could have.
: Now, Selleck bashers, what have you got against him?
: Reasoned answers please - nothing like "he has a big 'tash"
: Seeya
: Hannibal