Re: No ponytail... yet

Posted by Steve from ppp-61.col.cableone.net on July 22, 2000 at 19:30:04:

In Reply to: No ponytail... yet posted by Adam on July 22, 2000 at 12:19:23:

: : If you really hate to sound rude and arrogant--DON'T.
: : Your pompous nastiness was unnecessary.

: As I've stated, it was not my intention to be pompous OR nasty. I, like several others had posted in response to the original message, simply doubt the validity of this secret-Hollywood-bigwig-told-me-this-secret-information-that-no-one-else-knows-so-I'm-posting-it-here message.

: I stated my arguments (which are my opions, and I'm allowed to have them), provided supporting information, and made my case. It was that simple, and did nothing more. If anyone feels such an argument is "nasty", then I must say they are oversensitive.

: Should there indeed be some basis in fact behind this "leaked" information, then by all means, the individual who posted it may respond in any way he/she sees fit.

I see this type of post here pretty regularly, and basically I pay little attention to all of this so-called inside info. When I hear something, I always like another source, one that is reputable to back up the original story. It seems to me that 99 per cent of rumors are false, chalk it up to the fallibility of homo sapiens. I am not saying that the original post here falls into that category, just that I pay little attention to posts of this kind. The old saying, "take it with a grain of salt" is always in order when it comes to "inside info". Just my opinion. Regards, Steve

Follow Ups:

Post a Followup:

Name:    
E-Mail:  
Subject: 
Comments:

: : : If you really hate to sound rude and arrogant--DON'T.  
: : : Your pompous nastiness was unnecessary.

: : As I've stated, it was not my intention to be pompous OR nasty.  I, like several others had posted in response to the original message, simply doubt the validity of this secret-Hollywood-bigwig-told-me-this-secret-information-that-no-one-else-knows-so-I'm-posting-it-here message.

: : I stated my arguments (which are my opions, and I'm allowed to have them), provided supporting information, and made my case.  It was that simple, and did nothing more.  If anyone feels such an argument is "nasty", then I must say they are oversensitive.

: : Should there indeed be some basis in fact behind this "leaked" information, then by all means, the individual who posted it may respond in any way he/she sees fit.

:     I see this type of post here pretty regularly, and basically I pay little attention to all of this so-called inside info. When I hear something, I always like another source, one that is reputable to back up the original story. It seems to me that 99 per cent of rumors are false, chalk it up to the fallibility of homo sapiens. I am not saying that the original post here falls into that category, just that I pay little attention to posts of this kind. The old saying, "take it with a grain of salt" is always in order when it comes to "inside info".  Just my opinion.  Regards, Steve

Optional:

Link URL:   
Link Title: 
Image URL:

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ The Indyfan Forum ] [ FAQ ]