actually...

Posted by Indy Coil from pm11-7.northlink.com on November 23, 2000 at 12:59:18:

In Reply to: Re: It isn't that I don't want to see another Indy movie... posted by Reggie on November 23, 2000 at 11:37:21:

They should make it take place in the late 40's, like '47 or '48, then Indy's age would fit in with Ford's age. Meaning Indy would have aged as much as Ford has between '89 and now. Get it? Either way, they need to make it fast! Ford's age isn't the problem, he could be as old as dirt and still fit the Indy part, I'm worried and Connery! He's already in his early 70's, he ain't getting any younger! I'm afraid that he might kick the bucket soon(god forbid)! Granted Sean's a bodybuilder (which is why he still looks like he's 50 and even girls MY age think he's sexy), but he is getting weaker. I saw him in entrapment and he was I believe 70 when he made that movie, and he didn't look too good. 'Course I'm so used to seeing him in LC and other early 90's movies, maybe he just looked old and frail because of that.....

Follow Ups:

• Re: actually... J.C. 16:23:04 11/23/2000 (1)
  • I think what he was trying to say is... Indy Fan 0230423 20:10:52 11/23/2000 (0)

Post a Followup:

Name:    
E-Mail:  
Subject: 
Comments:

Link URL:   
Link Title: 
Image URL: