![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Posted by California Mike from 208-5-200-155.dialup.microweb.net on April 29, 2001 at 01:24:07:
In Reply to: Alden bootlaces: posted by Fall Guy on April 28, 2001 at 22:55:57:
: I've had my Aldens for 9 months. Two weeks ago the lace of the right
: boot gave up and ripped.
: Why did it happen? Well, after six months of wearing the boots I
: noticed (during my daily routine inspection!) that one lace was a bit
: scuffed in one spot. Maybe I should have used my Dremel on the new
: boots and polished those metal hooks a bit to reduce friction (I'll do
: that on my next pair of Aldens. I already got some emery cloth
: and jeweller's rouge for the final step in polishing!)
: I have some interesting information and specs on those bootlaces:
: b>
: LENGTH:
: When new (unused), each lace was 115 cm long. It would stretch to a
: maximum lenght of 124 cm under load. This means a maximum lenght
: increase of 7.82%
: Thickness:
: Each lace was 1.3 mm thick (I checked with calibrated calipers), but
: when stretched it would thin to just 1 mm. This means a whopping 33.s%
: decrease in thickness!
: Width:
: A new lace was 6 mm wide, when stretched to the maximum length it
: narrowed to 4.5 mm. This equals a 25% reduction in width.
: OBSERVATION:
: It is highly interesting that the bootlace that had been worn daily
: for the past 9 months had different specs altogether.
: It had actually been stretched to a maximum lenght of approximately
: 126 cm. I could not establish or verify the exact lenght because this
: measurement was taken after the lace had ripped in two halves. And I
: could not just measure the other still intact bootlace because I
: cannot guarantee that I tied the boots with equal force.
: The width and the thickness of the used lace were howver UNCHANGED
: compared to the unused lace under maximum load. This is a MYSTERY
: b> to be solved by some brave soul.
: FG
: PS: I forgot to mention, each lace weighs 3 grams...
: PPS: