Re: PG or PG-13? But not R.

Posted by ~The Raider~ from ppp-ip234-s05.inetnorth.net on October 20, 1998 at 20:53:25:

In Reply to: PG or PG-13? But not R. posted by The Grey Wanderer on October 20, 1998 at 20:44:51:

: I don't think anyone wants to see Indy IV with an R rating. R denotes language, sex, and extreme violence, the first two of which are hardly seen in the Indy movies. Although nowadays we can have two "f***"s in a movie and still rank a PG-13. Anyway, if they keep the violence to the other movies' levels, where we just see punches and (cool!) stunts and more punches, minimal blood, a few gunshots, they'll be OK. Language doesn't need to go past "godd***" or even "s***". No sex; hints, OK, but no barechested ladies or stuff. In fact, if they can deliver a kick-ass PG movie, that equals/outdoes (can it be outdone?) Raiders, they'll have accomplished something rare. Realistically, it'll probably be PG-13.

: What do you guys/gals think?

: -The Grey Wanderer

I agree. We have too many R movies. But keep in mind, it was the Indy movies that inspired the PG-13 rating in the first place

~The Raider

Follow Ups:

Post a Followup:

Name:    
E-Mail:  
Subject: 
Comments:

Link URL:   
Link Title: 
Image URL: