I understand

Posted by Michaelson from leospace047.utsi.edu on May 14, 2001 at 14:09:30:

In Reply to: Re: Agreed posted by Georgiana Jones on May 14, 2001 at 14:00:38:

I had a nice visit with one of my daughters friends last night, and we spoke about the random use of CGI. He's apparently a big participant on the gaming "cons" that take place all over the US, and he was telling me that there is as much interest in the making of Indy IV at those conventions as we have here, as they celebrate all things game OR movie related. He was asking me advice regarding a fedora, and the conversation moved toward the CGI debate. It's definitely a concern regarding what may or may not happen with Indy IV, and all I've spoken with say pretty much the same thing....a little works fine, but to much and you've created a real mess. It seems to be a universal agreement. The work you site at the end of Mummy II is an example, though it's one I could forgive, as there is enough action going on around it to be able to look past the problems, but then my eyes aren't that good anymore. (grins) Regards. Michaelson

: I liked the Mummy 1 and 2...can't wait for 3!

: I also saw the Mummy 2 twice...it is a bit better the second time around...
: the only thing that really made me wanna vomit was the stupid scorpion kind at the end...the second time it was hard to watch..

: Georgiana!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Follow Ups:

Post a Followup:

Name:    
E-Mail:  
Subject: 
Comments:

Link URL:   
Link Title: 
Image URL: