![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Posted by Harry from queeg.ludd.luth.se on June 03, 2001 at 19:22:21:
In Reply to: Bwahahahaha! posted by Fall Guy on June 03, 2001 at 04:15:35:
I see him being shot in the street for running his mouth and being so insulting and undignified.
: You're on your way to becoming one hell of an inkhorn. ;)
: FG
: : Armchair psychologists, gotta love 'em.
: : But your points aren't very well thought out. I didn't attack ANYBODY'S acting career and I surely didn't post all negative thoughts. Did you even SEE that I said Clooney would be GREAT in an Indyesque role? Seems to me that would qualify as seeing "the good" in something.
: : Regarding Kent's "Don't Respond" clause I think you're way off. Sounds like you don't even understand what he meant. I think Kent will back me up when I say he didn't want a ton of "Harrison Ford isn't too old" and "Everybody else sucks" posts. I think what he DID want was for people to discuss his candidates, which I did. Duchovny LOOKS like Ford, but he lacks the "spunk". Crowe, to me, seems a bit arrogant and doesn't really deserve such a coveted role. Treat Williams, although he possesses some Indy qualities, is NOT a bankable name, and you can't even argue with that. Clooney would be MY choice if a Ford replacement was ABSOLUTELY necessary. To me, Clooney has everything needed to successfully pull-off an Indyesque character, plus he DOES have the box-office clout needed.
: : Do me a favor and make sure your psychological profiling is warranted next time.
: : Austin Powers
: :
: :