Posted by Michaelson from leospace144.utsi.edu on June 27, 2001 at 20:32:43:
The July/August issue of "Archaeology" arrived today. You'll remember it was the one that featured Indy on the front cover several months ago, then villanized him as being a bad influence on the science. Well, check out www.archaeology.org, then click on the summer movie review. (yep, a science mag doing movie reviews now, as long as they're archaeology related) There's a two paragraph review of Mummy II. The mag review states (it isn't at the website) that "the appeal of Indiana Jones lay in part in his fallibility: his fear of snakes, his occasional bad luck with the ladies." Well editors, which is he, appealing or the worse thing that ever happened to the science? Regards. Michaelson