Posted by Rundquist from adsl-63-201-187-189.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net (63.201.187.189) on Thursday, September 06, 2001 at 7:59pm :
In Reply to: Does this have something to do with anything I said? posted by Fall Guy from pool0161.cvx19-bradley.dialup.earthlink.net (209.179.244.161) on Thursday, September 06, 2001 at 6:39pm :
Actually, my post didn't have much to do with your comments except where you are directly referenced. I just realized I hadn't finished my thoughts on the subject. I thought I'd help support my original post with some examples. Come to think of it, my original post is a little vague. Ah well. Cheers
: And where did I say that TOD and LC were "bad movies"?
: I said they didn't have good scripts for those two movies. I did not say that the movies were bad per se.
: Still, TOD is nothing more than one action sequence after the other (Though skillfully done), and for that and its darkness I love it.
: I like TOD much more than that bubble gum movie that LC is.
: LC worked only, because Ford and Connery were great together. But the plot is just pathetic.
: FG
: :
: :
This board is powered by the Mr. Fong Device from Cyberarmy.com |