Err...

Posted by JuggleEwok from spider-wd063.proxy.aol.com (205.188.193.178) on Thursday, February 21, 2002 at 7:19am :

In Reply to: Thats Exactly what Im saying! posted by Raider from ? (65.196.116.35) on Wednesday, February 20, 2002 at 10:33am :

Don't you need a Nielson box or something for them to know that you're even watching it? Or has their evil spy technology advanced?

: When you dont want to watch them on tv cause there butchered and interupted by ads is inconsiderate to the fact that you support tha cause! And the rating people will say hell theres alot of viewers for Indiana Jones so they show this to the movie industry bad bing bada boom we might have a new age in Indy stuff!
: -Raider

:
: : The way I look at it, is the more people watch Indy every time they play it on t.v., the higher "share" the movie gets, and the more the people in the Hollywood "biz" have to take notice that Indy is still a very popular commodity, so to speak. And of course, the more money they think they can make, the more Indy stuff we'll see. I hate to put it in the prospective of cash vs. quality entertainment, but when it comes down to it, thats what makes the entertainment world go 'round. Just my take on things...

: :
: : : Anyone else notice the little disclaimer that ABC ran before Raiders and Temple? It was the usual "may contain...parental guidance suggested, etc.", but began with the line "This film is part of the classic Indiana Jones Series..."

: : : Just thought it was odd.

: : : And of course we all know why it stated Indiana Jones SERIES, rather than TRILOGY....!

Follow Ups: Doesn't everyone have a Nielsen box? - Forrestal 4:09pm 02/21/2002 Post a Followup Name: E-Mail: ( default ) Subject: Message: : Don't you need a Nielson box or something for them to know that you're even watching it? Or has their evil spy technology advanced? : : When you dont want to watch them on tv cause there butchered and interupted by ads is inconsiderate to the fact that you support tha cause! And the rating people will say hell theres alot of viewers for Indiana Jones so they show this to the movie industry bad bing bada boom we might have a new age in Indy stuff! : : -Raider : : : : : The way I look at it, is the more people watch Indy every time they play it on t.v., the higher "share" the movie gets, and the more the people in the Hollywood "biz" have to take notice that Indy is still a very popular commodity, so to speak. And of course, the more money they think they can make, the more Indy stuff we'll see. I hate to put it in the prospective of cash vs. quality entertainment, but when it comes down to it, thats what makes the entertainment world go 'round. Just my take on things... : : : : : : : Anyone else notice the little disclaimer that ABC ran before Raiders and Temple? It was the usual "may contain...parental guidance suggested, etc.", but began with the line "This film is part of the classic Indiana Jones Series..." : : : : Just thought it was odd. : : : : And of course we all know why it stated Indiana Jones <b>SERIES</b>, rather than TRILOGY....! Optional Link ( default ) URL: Title: Optional Image Link ( default ) URL: This board is powered by the Mr. Fong Device from Cyberarmy.com