Posted by Kenal0 from d40.focal4.interaccess.com on October 03, 2000 at 19:16:24:
In Reply to: Thanks! posted by Patterson on October 03, 2000 at 18:15:08:
: : Jacket looks great. My personal opinion is that your jacket will look
: : like a well broke in Raiders jacket before mine which is lambskin. The lambskin is just too soft and will not show the creasing and patina like the horsehide is going to. If I did not have 3 horsehide A-2s in my closet along with a few horsehide motorcycle jackets I would order 1 today. Now wear it, sit on it, throw it around a bit (all in a loving way) and in a short time that jacket will look like
: : a well worn Raiders jacket. The lambkskin will never show the wear like that horsehide. Very nice
: : Kenal0
: High praise from the horsehide crowd! Yes, I'm afraid I may be hooked on this kind of leather. Every guy who knows his salt on this horsehide says the same thing you have "sit on it, throw it in the backyard for a few days, put it on the train tracks - livingly, of course..." - I think I see a pattern. I agree - once the gloss breaks and the grain comes out, and once it "relaxes" this will be a dead-ringer. I was planning on a second in lamb, but I may just have to go with another horsehide in russet? Stick with veg, or what about chrome tanned horse? Thoughts?
: Cheers!
: Patterson
I would always take the Veg tanned over the Chrome tanned every time.
The old world way is the veg tannin. It just takes too long and is too expensive to do on all leathers. My Chrome tanned horsehide has always been stiff as cardboard and taken a lot longer to break in. They have also been 3.5 oz leather so they have been heavier to start with. I would go with the Russet veg tanned for a nice change.d
Go to the following link and open the images to see veg tanned russet horsehide after it is well worn. http://www.acmedepot.com/a2jacket/a2detail.html